The short answer from Chairman Conor Delaney, MD, PhD
A: There is absolutely a best practice. It’s total mesorectal excision (TME) with a goal — based on preoperative imaging with magnetic resonance — to have a negative circumferential excision margin. That may mean going beyond the normal TME plane and removing other organs en bloc to ensure a negative circumferential margin.
Advertisement
Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy
What is less clear is the best surgical approach. My interpretation of the literature is that COLOR II and other randomized trials show oncological equivalence for laparoscopy. Therefore, it is my first approach, when possible, as we provide the patients other short-term benefits, such as earlier recovery, and fewer complications.
Transanal TME is a new option, which I believe is helpful for heavier patients with lower tumors. However, we await the results of the COLOR III trial. Early results from nonrandomized trials look promising however.
I reserve open surgery for complex reoperative cases, complex multivisceral resections or the highest BMI patients. I don’t use robotics because I believe the ROLARR trial shows equivalence with laparoscopy and has not shown a value equation to support the extra expense and operative time of robotics, outside of research studies. The ROLARR trial did show a reduced conversion rate compared to laparoscopic surgery in some subgroups, but these were generally heavier males who one could do with transanal TME. Robotics would have a number needed to treat (NNT) of about 11, which makes it a difficult value proposition.
So overall, a carefully performed, laparoscopic TME by an experienced surgeon who is part of a multidisciplinary care team is best.
— Conor Delaney, MD, PhD
Chairman, Digestive Disease & Surgery Institute
Cleveland Clinic
Advertisement
Advertisement
First-of-its-kind research investigates the viability of standard screening to reduce the burden of late-stage cancer diagnoses
Global R&D efforts expanding first-line and relapse therapy options for patients
Study demonstrates ability to reduce patients’ reliance on phlebotomies to stabilize hematocrit levels
A case study on the value of access to novel therapies through clinical trials
Findings highlight an association between obesity and an increased incidence of moderate-severe disease
Cleveland Clinic Cancer Institute takes multi-faceted approach to increasing clinical trial access 23456
Key learnings from DESTINY trials
Overall survival in patients treated since 2008 is nearly 20% higher than in earlier patients