Locations:
Search IconSearch
February 22, 2021/Cancer/Radiation Oncology

IMRT for Diffuse Cutaneous Breast Cancer Metastases

Minimizing patient discomfort, improving quality of life

650×450-Breast-Cancer-Skin-Reoccurances

Thanks to advances in screening and treatments, patients with breast cancer are living longer. As a result, diffuse cutaneous metastases are becoming more common, and these skin lesions can severely impact patient quality of life. Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center’s Department of Radiation Oncology has developed techniques that minimize patient discomfort and improve quality of life using streamlined intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT).

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

“There’s a common myth that once a patient has been treated with radiation for breast cancer, they cannot be treated again, or that the area of skin metastases is too large to treat,” says Chirag Shah, MD, Director of Breast Radiation Oncology at Cleveland Clinic Cancer Center. “We absolutely can use radiation on large, diffuse skin metastases while sparing the heart and lung, which is really important because these cases are not commonly treated with surgical interventions.”

Conventional techniques, such as 3-dimension conformal radiation therapy and electron fields, are difficult to set up and cannot spare normal tissues as well in the re-irradiation setting. With IMRT, patients can receive high doses of radiation that avoid normal tissues and are effective in re-irradiation. Some centers use this approach for diffuse cutaneous metastases, but no published guidelines or preferred methodologies exist.

IMRT techniques

A recent report published in The Breast Journaloffers a methodology that improved quality of life for several patients and is preferred by Cleveland Clinic clinicians for patients presenting with such clinical indications. The report discusses five patients who initially had locally advanced, nonmetastatic breast cancer and a median time to metastatic recurrence of 17 months. Four of five patients had been treated with postmastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT).

Clinical presentation. (A) Right axilla (B) Chest wall (C) Posterior chest wall (D) Posterior chest wall one month after completion of 30 Gy in 10 fractions with near complete response. Figure and caption republished with permission from Wiley.

Advertisement

“Our preferred technique involves mapping areas of disease and then wiring 2 to 3 centimeters beyond that while placing bolus to enhance skin dose. Then we utilize the treatment planning system to turn the wires into a volume to be treated. The patients are lying down, and this takes about an hour,” says Dr. Shah, senior author of the paper.

A dosimetrist working with a computer algorithm turns the map into preliminary radiation targets, which clinicians review and adjust to ensure accuracy. The dosimetrist in conjunction with the algorithm then develops an IMRT plan that spares normal tissue. Patients with metastatic disease and previous RT commonly receive a range of doses from 30 to 66 Gy/10 to 33 fractions.

Of the five patients in the report, four patients experienced a complete or near complete response at three months. Two had received concurrent hyperthermia during IMRT. All experienced grade 3 dermatitis.

“These patients can be very ill, and of the five we treated, three have since passed away,” says Dr. Shah. “But our efforts to alleviate their pain and improve their quality of life by reducing their burden of cutaneous metastases are an important part of what we do here. Patients with severe cancer recurrences can have improved quality of life with the proper planning and techniques.”

Advertisement

Related Articles

Doctors working on MGUS screening study
March 18, 2024/Cancer/Research
Pilot Study Aims for Early Identification of Multiple Myeloma Precursor Among Black Patients

First-of-its-kind research investigates the viability of standard screening to reduce the burden of late-stage cancer diagnoses

Hematologist at Cleveland Clinic
March 14, 2024/Cancer/Blood Cancers
Advances in Mantle Cell Lymphoma Treatment (Podcast)

Global R&D efforts expanding first-line and relapse therapy options for patients

Physician with patient
March 6, 2024/Cancer/Research
Targeting Uncontrolled Erythrocytosis in Polycythemia Vera with Rusfertide

Study demonstrates ability to reduce patients’ reliance on phlebotomies to stabilize hematocrit levels

Dr. Jagadeesh at Cleveland Clinic
February 28, 2024/Cancer/Blood Cancers
Treating Patient with Systemic T-Cell Lymphoma and Graft-Versus-Host Disease

A case study on the value of access to novel therapies through clinical trials

Doctor measuring patient's waist size
February 26, 2024/Cancer/Research
Impact of Obesity on GVHD & Transplant Outcomes in Hematologic Malignancies

Findings highlight an association between obesity and an increased incidence of moderate-severe disease

Physician with patient
February 21, 2024/Cancer/Research
Strategies for Improving Clinical Trial Equity

Cleveland Clinic Cancer Institute takes multi-faceted approach to increasing clinical trial access 23456

How antibody drug conjugates work
February 13, 2024/Cancer/Research
Real-World Use of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan

Key learnings from DESTINY trials

CQD-4445459-rotz-650×450
February 7, 2024/Cancer
Advances in Bone Marrow Transplant Have Improved Outcomes in Fanconi Anemia

Overall survival in patients treated since 2008 is nearly 20% higher than in earlier patients

Ad