Locations:
Search IconSearch
December 19, 2016/Orthopaedics/Hip & Knee

Surgical Trends for Treating Osteonecrosis of the Hip

Most patients still receive total hip arthroplasty

16-ort-2549-mont-hero-image-650x450pxl

By Michael A. Mont, MD

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

Osteonecrosis is a potentially devastating disorder of various joints including the hip, knee, shoulder and ankle and can progress to end-stage arthritis. Osteonecrosis has many causes, with corticosteroids and alcohol abuse accounting for over two-thirds of cases. The pathophysiology and pathology of osteonecrosis is similar regardless of etiology, with bone death leading to joint collapse and eventual arthritis. The treatment of this disease aims to halt the progression or delay the onset of arthritis.

The treatment of osteonecrosis of the hip (also known as avascular necrosis or AVN) has evolved over the past two decades. Multiple treatment options are available for this younger population of patients based on their disease stage and progression, orthopaedist’s experience and patient preference. However, once substantial joint surface collapse has occurred, or signs of degenerative arthritis appear, total joint arthroplasty becomes the most appropriate treatment option. Osteonecrosis cases make up an estimated 10 percent of all total hip arthroplasties performed annually in the United States. However, the utilization of treatment options for hip AVN is currently unknown.

Finding answers with NSQIP

Therefore, we conducted an analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) surgical outcome database to determine the trends of surgical treatment of hip osteonecrosis between 2008 and 2014. Using ICD-9, we identified 3,958 cases of hip osteonecrosis that underwent surgical treatment during this time period. We determined annual distribution of surgical treatments for all specific procedures and for joint-sparing versus joint-replacing procedures. The overall number of surgical procedures performed annually increased from 88 to 1,161 between 2008 and 2014. The rate of total hip arthroplasty performed has increased during this time period from 81 percent in 2008 to 95 percent in 2014. Although the number of joint-preserving procedures increased during this time period, the percentage of preserving procedures decreased annually.

Advertisement

16-ort-2549-mont-inset-figure-02-650pxl-width

MRI of hip osteonecrosis. Arrow indicates a necrotic zone

The findings of this study validate previous reports that found total hip arthroplasty to be the most common procedure performed for treatment of osteonecrosis of the hip. The results also demonstrate an increasing number of procedures performed for osteonecrosis, suggesting higher awareness of this disease.

Advances on the horizon

Operative interventions for early stage disease include joint-preserving procedures such as core decompression, with or without the use of bone grafts, and biologic agents such as bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP), or cell-based therapy. These procedures first evacuate the necrotic bone through a window in the femoral head-neck junction and subsequently fill the defect with a combination of the above-mentioned materials. At Cleveland Clinic, some of these treatments, such as BMPs, percutaneous drilling and the “trapdoor” procedure, which replaces the dead bone with cancellous and cortical autograft, are being studied and have been quite successful. These joint-preserving procedures are usually attempted in precollapse lesions, when the articular cartilage is generally intact with only the underlying subchondral bone affected.

Conversely, after severe subchondral collapse has occurred, procedures that attempt to salvage the joint are rarely successful, and joint arthroplasty is necessary to relieve pain. Joint arthroplasties, such as hip resurfacing and total hip arthroplasty, are chosen depending on the extent of the disease. Fortunately, reports have shown successful results for these procedures utilizing modern prostheses.

Advertisement

Dr. Mont is Chair of the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery.

Advertisement

Related Articles

Blue illustration of knee with torn ACL in red
February 29, 2024/Orthopaedics/Hip & Knee
Aspiration and Corticosteroid Injection Are Safe After ACL Injury

Study reports zero infections in nearly 300 patients

Swollen knee with scar
February 26, 2024/Orthopaedics/Hip & Knee
Is Joint Inflammation and Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty an Infection or Gout?

How to diagnose and treat crystalline arthropathy after knee replacement

Close up of the one round white pill in female hand.
January 4, 2024/Orthopaedics/Hip & Knee
Patients Use Less Pain Medication After Robot-Assisted Hip Replacement Compared With Conventional Surgery

Reduced narcotic use is the latest on the list of robotic surgery advantages

The Featured Image for the post
November 29, 2023/Orthopaedics/Hip & Knee
What We’ve Learned From 10,000 Robot-Assisted Total Joint Replacements

Cleveland Clinic orthopaedic surgeons share their best tips, most challenging cases and biggest misperceptions

23-ORI-4156360 CQD 650×450
September 22, 2023/Orthopaedics/Hip & Knee
3 Myths of Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty

How it actually compares to posterior and lateral approaches

22-ORI-3183858 CQD 650×450
September 20, 2023/Orthopaedics/Hip & Knee
Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Could Be Right for 50% of Patients With Osteoarthritis

When procedure is performed by high-volume surgeons, outcomes are comparable to total knee replacement

23-ORI-4156359 CQD 650×450
September 8, 2023/Orthopaedics/Hip & Knee
BEAR Implant: The Missing Link in Improving ACL Repair

Clot substitute helps rejoin the stumps of a torn ligament

Ad