Locations:
Search IconSearch

Shoulder Dislocation in the Adolescent Athlete

Teens often require more aggressive care than adults

14-OrT-979-Saluan-Hero-Image-690x380pxl

By Joseph Styron, MD, PhD, and Paul Saluan, MD

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

The shoulder’s remarkable range of motion has the unfortunate downside of decreased stability since it relies predominantly on soft tissue for restraint. Most shoulder dislocations occur in the second or sixth decades of life, but a shoulder dislocation follows a very different clinical course in a teenager than it does in an adult in his or her 50s.

Young people are more likely to suffer intracapsular dislocations that result in capsular and labral detachments (Figure 1). This injury pattern may partly explain why young patients are far more likely to have subsequent dislocations. At the same time, younger patients are much less likely than their older counterparts to have rotator cuff tears resulting from the shoulder dislocation.

Figure 1. Axial cut from an MRI demonstrating an anterior labral tear and posterior bruising of the humerus.

Figure 1. Axial cut from an MRI demonstrating an anterior labral tear and posterior bruising of the humerus.

The chance of suffering a recurrent shoulder dislocation is approximately 90 percent in patients under age 20 as compared with approximately 15 percent in patients over age 40. This is believed to be due to the higher type III collagen content in the shoulder capsule and ligaments of teenagers relative to middle-aged adults. Type III collagen is far more supple and elastic than the tougher type I collagen, which is the predominant collagen in the tissues of older adults. This increased elasticity may result in the shoulder capsule and ligaments having too much laxity after a dislocation to provide adequate restraint to keep the glenohumeral joint reduced.

Advertisement

Evaluation: Four Findings Consistent with Recurrent Instability

Obtaining a thorough patient history is paramount in determining the cause of the dislocation. In addition, any recurrent sensations of subluxation or instability need to be probed to elucidate the position in which the shoulder feels unstable and the nature of the sensation. Not all patients with shoulders capable of subluxating actually report the sensation, however. In one study, only 50 percent of patients whose shoulder subluxated could feel the sensation of the subluxation.1

The following are among the physical exam signs and tests that can yield findings most consistent with a shoulder with recurrent instability:

  • The sulcus sign, which refers to a dimple seen below the acromion as the arm is inferiorly translated. The superior glenohumeral ligament is the primary ligament evaluated in this test, and any sulcus of 2 cm or more is highly suggestive of shoulder instability.
  • The load and shift test, which is performed with the patient supine with the scapula halfway off the edge of the examination table. The examiner attempts to shift the humeral head in the anterior, posterior and inferior directions to assess whether the humeral head is able to be dislocated and whether it will spontaneously reduce.
  • The apprehension test, in which the patient is again supine with half of the scapula off the edge of the table. The patient’s arm is abducted and externally rotated to 90 degrees and then gradually rotated and extended further. A positive apprehension test occurs when the patient becomes apprehensive that his or her shoulder is going to dislocate or subluxate.
  • The relocation test, which is an extension of the apprehension test in which the examiner applies a posteriorly directed force on the humeral head, attempting to relocate the glenohumeral joint. The test is positive when the patient reports improvement in symptoms with the posteriorly directed force.

Advertisement

Treatment: Aggressiveness Often Indicated

Due to the higher risk of recurrent instability in adolescents, particularly among athletes, adolescents with shoulder dislocations may require more aggressive treatment than do older patients. Some studies have demonstrated superior results for operative treatment over nonoperative management in this younger age group. In one study, 75 percent of nonoperatively managed patients developed recurrent shoulder dislocation while only 11 percent of surgically treated patients had recurrent shoulder instability.2

Future Patients

Cleveland Cleveland’s Department of Orthopaedic Surgery has a team of sports health orthopaedic surgeons who provide surgical management of shoulder dislocation in adolescent athletes and bring experience in the subtle differences in management from the adult setting. This team welcomes any patient who has experienced a shoulder dislocation, whether for the first time or on multiple occasions, and will counsel the patient and his or her family comprehensively on the prognosis and treatment options.

Figure 2. Arthroscopic photo of the debridement of the labral tear from Figure 1.

Figure 2. Arthroscopic photo of the debridement of the labral tear from Figure 1.

Figure 3. Arthroscopic photo of the suture anchors tying down the labrum to the glenoid rim (photo bottom) to restore stability to the glenohumeral joint. (The humeral head is the white dome at the top of the image.)

Figure 3. Arthroscopic photo of the suture anchors tying down the labrum to the glenoid rim (photo bottom) to restore stability to the glenohumeral joint. (The humeral head is the white dome at the top of the image.)

References

  1. Neer CS II, Foster CR. Inferior capsular shift for involuntary inferior and multidirectional instability of the shoulder: a preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62(6):897-908
  2. Bottoni CR, Wilckens JH, DeBerardino TM, et al. A prospective, randomized evaluation of arthroscopic stabilization versus nonoperative treatment in patients with acute, traumatic, first-time shoulder dislocations. Am J Sports Med. 2002;30(4):576-580.

Advertisement

About the Authors

Dr. Styron is a resident in the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery.

Dr. Saluan is a surgeon with the Center for Pediatric Orthopaedics and Center for Sports Health in the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery.

Advertisement

Related Articles

X-ray showing leg bones
March 6, 2024/Orthopaedics/Tumor
The Latest in Limb-Sparing Techniques for Pediatric Patients With Sarcoma

Biologic approaches, growing implants and more

Blue illustration of knee with torn ACL in red
February 29, 2024/Orthopaedics/Hip & Knee
Aspiration and Corticosteroid Injection Are Safe After ACL Injury

Study reports zero infections in nearly 300 patients

Swollen knee with scar
February 26, 2024/Orthopaedics/Hip & Knee
Is Joint Inflammation and Pain After Total Knee Arthroplasty an Infection or Gout?

How to diagnose and treat crystalline arthropathy after knee replacement

Multiple MRI scans of knees
February 12, 2024/Orthopaedics/Arthritis
Arthritis Foundation and Cleveland Clinic to Build National Osteoarthritis Imaging Center

Center will coordinate, interpret and archive imaging data for all multicenter trials conducted by the foundation’s Osteoarthritis Clinical Trial Network

Close up of the one round white pill in female hand.
January 4, 2024/Orthopaedics/Hip & Knee
Patients Use Less Pain Medication After Robot-Assisted Hip Replacement Compared With Conventional Surgery

Reduced narcotic use is the latest on the list of robotic surgery advantages

ORI_Viars_4102672_Hand Surgery Bootcamp – Dr. Styron_08-18-23
December 21, 2023/Orthopaedics/Upper Extremity
Boot Camp Prepares Trainees for Hand Surgery Fellowships

Cleveland Clinic specialists offer annual refresher on upper extremity fundamentals

The Featured Image for the post
November 29, 2023/Orthopaedics/Hip & Knee
What We’ve Learned From 10,000 Robot-Assisted Total Joint Replacements

Cleveland Clinic orthopaedic surgeons share their best tips, most challenging cases and biggest misperceptions

Ad