Locations:
Search IconSearch

Research to Predict Pre- and Post-Transplant Survival in Heart Failure Lands $2.8M NIH Grant

Will use machine learning and more to gauge survival disparities

18-HRT-4543-Heart transplant-650×450

The National Institutes of Health has awarded a research team led by Cleveland Clinic cardiologist Eileen Hsich, MD, $2.8 million to examine disparities in survival among heart failure patients before and after heart transplantation. The four-year grant also supports development of new data tools, including machine learning methods, to optimize outcomes in this population.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

“Disparities in survival exist among patients during their time on the waiting list for heart transplant and also following transplantation,” says Dr. Hsich, Associate Medical Director of Cleveland Clinic’s Cardiac Transplant Program and co-principal investigator (PI) on the grant. “The research funded by this award will identify factors contributing to these population differences, with the aim of improving survival and minimizing organ wastage.”

She adds that the goal is to lay the groundwork for ultimate development of “a dynamic and improved way to allocate donor hearts in the future,” although the current grant does not cover work to create an allocation score.

Three interrelated research projects

The grant will support three research projects focused on the following:

  • Applying machine learning statistical methods to the national Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients (SRTR) to identify major risk factors and quantify how their interactions affect differences in survival before and after transplant. Among the factors to be assessed are sex, race, type of heart disease, socioeconomic status, presence/absence of mechanical circulatory support and U.S. region.
  • Using data from Cleveland Clinic and four other U.S. medical centers to develop the first method to dynamically update risk of death on the national heart transplant waiting list so that clinicians are alerted to patients’ changing conditions. The researchers will use variables not currently collected by the SRTR — such as tests of sodium, albumin and natriuretic peptides — as well as serial clinical assessments reflecting changes in condition. The four other participating centers are Northwestern University, University of Pennsylvania, University of Pittsburgh and Duke University Medical Center.
  • Using data from the first two projects to develop statistical models that simultaneously estimate risk of waiting list mortality, time to transplantation and risk of post-transplant death. The models will base risk estimates on patient characteristics and health while on the waiting list. The aim will be to improve estimates of optimal timing for transplant as a patient’s condition evolves, along the lines of risk prediction models currently used in lung, liver and kidney transplantation.

Advertisement

Accounting for more variables

“The existing heart allocation system is based on tiers that prioritize patients by risk of death mainly by need for mechanical circulatory support or certain medications, but it doesn’t account for how their condition changes, their likelihood of getting transplanted or their risk of death after transplant,” explains Dr. Hsich, who has published extensively on disparities among heart transplant candidates (see this prior Consult QD story).

Dr. Hsich will collaborate closely with her co-PI, Hemant Ishwaran, PhD, Director of Statistical Methodology at the University of Miami Health System, who formerly worked at Cleveland Clinic. She says the statistical models to be developed will be more sophisticated than the dynamic model currently used for liver allocation and should ultimately be applicable to allocation of donor organs beyond the heart.

“Our approach is innovative because it uses new mathematical approaches and seeks to shift current heart failure research and clinical practice paradigms by taking into account population differences rather than basing decisions solely on ejection fraction, presence of coronary artery disease and stages of disease,” Dr. Hsich observes.

Advertisement

Related Articles

19-HRT-6507 Vitals-650×450
Rani duplicate post Check Out These Outcomes

A sampling of outcome and volume data from our Heart & Vascular Institute

illustration of the human heart focused on the left atrial appendage
Takeaways From Updated STS Guidelines for Surgical Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation

Concomitant AF ablation and LAA occlusion strongly endorsed during elective heart surgery

illustration of a figure-of-8 stitch for aortic valve repair
Figure-of-8, Hitch-Up Stitch Is Safe and Durable in Bicuspid Aortic Valve Repair

Large retrospective study supports its addition to BAV repair toolbox at expert centers

histology image of lung tissue showing spread through air spaces (STAS)
Lung Cancer Study Links Preoperative Factors With Spread Through Air Spaces

Young age, solid tumor, high uptake on PET and KRAS mutation signal risk, suggest need for lobectomy

x-ray of bone fracture in a forearm
TRAVERSE Substudy Links Testosterone Therapy to Increased Fracture Risk in Older Men With Hypogonadism

Surprise findings argue for caution about testosterone use in men at risk for fracture

echocardiogram showing severe aortic regurgitation
Early Referral for Enlarged Roots Critical to Prevent Residual AR After Aortic Root Replacement With Valve Reimplantation

Residual AR related to severe preoperative AR increases risk of progression, need for reoperation

photo of intubated elderly woman in hospital bed
Proteomic Study Characterizes Markers of Frailty in Cardiovascular Disease and Their Links to Outcomes

Findings support emphasis on markers of frailty related to, but not dependent on, age

3D transesophageal echocardiographic images
New Leaflet Modification Technique Curbs LVOT Obstruction Risk in Valve-in-Valve TMVR

Provides option for patients previously deemed anatomically unsuitable

Ad