Get a glimpse of the facilities and technologies used by the nation’s top-ranked heart program
Today’s release of the 2021-22 “Best Hospitals” rankings by U.S. News & World Report marks the 27th straight year that Cleveland Clinic’s Heart, Vascular & Thoracic Institute has been recognized as the nation’s No. 1 program for cardiology and heart surgery.
Advertisement
Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy
The program’s core strength is its caregivers, who deliver unsurpassed outcomes and experience to patients day in and day out. These caregivers’ achievements stem mostly from qualities involving the science and art of medicine — intangibles like training, dedication and empathy. But those intangibles require spaces and tools to be put into action, and Cleveland Clinic is proud to offer its patients the finest facilities and technologies to meet their needs.
To share how these tools enable Cleveland Clinic cardiac, vascular and thoracic caregivers to do what they do best every day, Consult QD presents a photo essay in the gallery below. Although far from comprehensive, it shares a few examples of how Cleveland Clinic teams are leveraging leading-edge equipment and facilities to realize every advancement that’s possible for patients who come from around the globe for Cleveland Clinic care.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
Slide 1/15
Advertisement
Advertisement
A sampling of outcome and volume data from our Heart & Vascular Institute
Concomitant AF ablation and LAA occlusion strongly endorsed during elective heart surgery
Large retrospective study supports its addition to BAV repair toolbox at expert centers
Young age, solid tumor, high uptake on PET and KRAS mutation signal risk, suggest need for lobectomy
Surprise findings argue for caution about testosterone use in men at risk for fracture
Residual AR related to severe preoperative AR increases risk of progression, need for reoperation
Findings support emphasis on markers of frailty related to, but not dependent on, age
Provides option for patients previously deemed anatomically unsuitable