Locations:
Search IconSearch
November 24, 2017/Neurosciences/Research

No Increased Risk of Gestational Diabetes in Women Taking Atypical Antipsychotics, Study Finds

Over 300 exposed women studied from a national pregnancy registry

17-NEU-4273-Viguera-Antipsychotics-Pregnancy-650×450

In a newly published study in the Journal of Psychiatric Research (2017 Dec;95:84-90), women taking second-generation antipsychotic medications during pregnancy had no increased risk of developing gestational diabetes compared with a similar cohort of pregnant women who did not take these medications.

Advertisement

Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy

So-called atypical or second-generation antipsychotics — most of which were approved in the mid-1990s for treatment of schizophrenia and other psychoses — have been linked to weight gain and a greater risk of developing diabetes, so their safety in pregnancy has been of concern. Since their approval, the drugs have also been widely prescribed for various nonpsychotic conditions, including depression, anxiety, autism, obsessive-compulsive disorder and sleep problems.

“Because atypical antipsychotics are so commonly used and have a known association with diabetes, we were relieved that we didn’t detect an increased risk of gestational diabetes in pregnant women,” says Adele Viguera, MD, a study co-author and psychiatrist with Cleveland Clinic’s Department of Psychiatry and Psychology and Center for Behavioral Health. She is also the emeritus Associate Director of the Perinatal and Reproductive Psychiatry Program at Massachusetts General Hospital, where she practiced before coming to Cleveland Clinic.

Study design and findings

The study, based on data collected by the Massachusetts General Hospital National Pregnancy Registry for Atypical Antipsychotics (NPRAA), evaluated 303 women who took atypical antipsychotics in the first trimester of pregnancy and compared them with 149 nonexposed women who also had a psychiatric condition. Gestational diabetes was determined from the medical record or by maternal report of the diagnosis during pregnancy or postpartum.

The crude odds ratio (OR) of developing gestational diabetes for women taking atypical antipsychotics was 1.02 (95% CI, 0.54 to 1.91) relative to the control group, and 0.79 (0.40 to 1.56) after adjusting for age, race, socioeconomic factors, smoking and primary psychiatric diagnosis. The study authors concluded that the findings suggested no increased risk.

Advertisement

The authors noted that the study selected only women who did not have diabetes before pregnancy, so it’s possible that women in the study — many of whom had taken the drugs for some time before pregnancy — were less likely to be susceptible to diabetogenic effects of the medications, introducing a bias. However, adding women from the database who had pre-gestational diabetes to the analysis did not change the outcome of a null association.

This study was a secondary analysis of another recent investigation based on the registry. That investigation, published in the American Journal of Psychiatry (2016;173:263-270), evaluated whether the use of atypical antipsychotics in pregnancy led to major malformations in newborns. In that study, no statistically significant difference was found between women taking the medications compared with women who were not exposed.

In both studies, the sample size was too small to allow separate analysis of the effects of individual drugs.

“We intend to continue our studies as more data become available in the registry,” adds Dr. Viguera, who was a co-author of the newborn malformation study. “At this time, our findings can provide reassurance to women that these drugs appear to be safe to take in pregnancy.”

National registry advances research

The NPRAA was established in 2008 as part of the National Pregnancy Registry for Psychiatric Medications, which also includes separate databases for antidepressants and for other psychiatric medications (stimulants, anxiolytics and other agents). It was co-founded by Dr. Viguera with Lee S. Cohen, MD, psychiatrist at Massachusetts General Hospital. The two continue to collaborate on research and overseeing the registry, which is the only one of its kind in the United States.

Advertisement

The registry continuously enrolls pregnant women between ages 18 and 45 with a history of psychiatric illness, and now contains more than 1,000 women. Phone interviews are conducted prospectively at enrollment, at seven months’ gestation, and two to three months postpartum. Authorization for access to medical records is obtained for obstetric care, labor and delivery, and newborn pediatric care.

All pharmaceutical companies that market atypical antipsychotics are invited to sponsor the registry, and a list of current sponsors, past sponsors and companies who have declined sponsorship is available on the registry website.

According to Dr. Viguera, safeguards are in place to ensure that research is conducted independently of pharmaceutical sponsorship by having a separate scientific advisory board and by not sharing preliminary results with sponsors.

She adds that published findings of the NPRAA studies are timely as FDA requirements shift from an arbitrary category labeling system for medication package inserts to a more descriptive explanation of risk based on available published data.

“Such reproductive safety data are invaluable to physicians advising patients,” Dr. Viguera notes. “Questions on the safety of psychiatric drugs could not be studied as quickly and inexpensively without the participation of women who sign up for the national registry. These registry-enabled studies support obstetricians and psychiatrists by providing them with important evidence-based guidance.”

For more information on the registry, call 1-866-961-2388 or email registry@womensmentalhealth.org.

Advertisement

Related Articles

16-NEU-2800-Kubu-101058161-650×450
What Do Patients Want from DBS for Parkinson’s Disease?

New study advances understanding of patient-defined goals

photo of a man sleeping at a desk, with a podcast icon overlay
March 15, 2024/Neurosciences/Podcast
Diagnosis and Management of Idiopathic Hypersomnia (Podcast)

Testing options and therapies are expanding for this poorly understood sleep disorder

illustration of an alzheimer brain and a packet of sildenafil pills
March 11, 2024/Neurosciences/Research
Sildenafil as an Alzheimer’s Candidate Drug: Further Support From Insurance Database and Mechanistic Studies

Real-world claims data and tissue culture studies set the stage for randomized clinical testing

brain scan showing perimesencephalic subarachnoid hemorrhage
Study Supports Less-Strict Monitoring for Nonaneurysmal Perimesencephalic SAH Without Hydrocephalus

Digital subtraction angiography remains central to assessment of ‘benign’ PMSAH

illustrated brain with the letters "AI" on a computer circuit board
As AI Tools Emerge, Be Proactive and Engaged to Shape Their Development

Cleveland Clinic neuromuscular specialist shares insights on AI in his field and beyond

histology image of a gray matter lesion in a multiple sclerosis brain
Study Suggests Protective Role for Microglia at Borders of Gray Matter Lesions in Progressive MS

Findings challenge dogma that microglia are exclusively destructive regardless of location in brain

series of digital-looking brain icons with a podcast button overlay on top
March 1, 2024/Neurosciences/Podcast
Harnessing the Power of AI in Medicine (Podcast)

Neurology is especially well positioned for opportunities to enhance clinical care and medical training

illustration of a neuron affected by multiple sclerosis
Clinical Trials in Progressive MS: An Assessment of Advances and Remaining Challenges

New review distills insights from studies over the past decade

Ad