Research shows no evidence of benefit says American College of Physicians
The American College of Physicians (ACP) recently issued guidelines advising against routine coronary artery disease screening for most adults who are at low risk for heart problems. The new guidelines focus on cardiac screening with electrocardiogram (EKG or ECG), a stress echocardiogram or myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI).
Advertisement
Cleveland Clinic is a non-profit academic medical center. Advertising on our site helps support our mission. We do not endorse non-Cleveland Clinic products or services. Policy
Screenings for low-risk adults are unlikely to give findings that will change patient management or improve patient outcomes, the guidelines say. Research shows that 90 percent of low-risk adults without symptoms will not have a cardiac event, such as a heart attack, in the 10 years post-screening. “This means that there will be few benefits, but serious potential harms from screening tests,” the guidelines say. Adults are considered low risk for coronary heart disease if they are young, without a family history of early heart disease, are physically active and eat a healthy diet.
Cardiac screening tests still are frequently obtained in clinical practice despite potential harm and insufficient evidence of benefits. Electrocardiography is among the most commonly performed diagnostic tests in the United States.
The ACP paper says several factors may contribute to inappropriate cardiac screening of low-risk adults. These include:
Stress tests are best used when all information about a patient is considered, says cardiologist Curtis Rimmerman, MD. “The stress test has to be applied within the context of the patient and looking at the entire patient: their risk factor profile, their symptoms, their age and their activity level, among other information,” Dr. Rimmerman says. “In those patients who are truly low risk, oftentimes your clinical acumen can be applied very accurately and further testing really isn’t necessary.” Unnecessary stress tests can result in false-positives, Dr. Rimmerman says. That can lead to more testing, such as a heart catheterization, which can be risky and more complicated. Patient risks from the screening tests include exposure to radiation, adverse reaction to an injection, or problems during exercise, the ACP says. For patients, follow-up testing and procedures can cause anxiety and take time away from work or family. “There is a time and a place for necessary testing,” Dr. Rimmerman says. “This is a best-practice issue and, especially, an issue of what is in the best interests of the patient.”
Advertisement
Rather than screen low-risk adults for coronary artery disease, the ACP recommends that physicians focus on promoting to their patients strategies to improve their heart health. Such strategies would include modifying patient behaviors that lead to increased risk for heart disease. These include smoking, diabetes, high blood pressure, high cholesterol and being overweight. The complete statement from the ACP appears online in the journal Annals of Internal Medicine.
Advertisement
Advertisement
A sampling of outcome and volume data from our Heart & Vascular Institute
Concomitant AF ablation and LAA occlusion strongly endorsed during elective heart surgery
Large retrospective study supports its addition to BAV repair toolbox at expert centers
Young age, solid tumor, high uptake on PET and KRAS mutation signal risk, suggest need for lobectomy
Surprise findings argue for caution about testosterone use in men at risk for fracture
Residual AR related to severe preoperative AR increases risk of progression, need for reoperation
Findings support emphasis on markers of frailty related to, but not dependent on, age
Provides option for patients previously deemed anatomically unsuitable